"Strength lies in differences, not in similarities."
-Stephen Covey
“Diversity” is a bit of a buzzword in modern choral circles,
and with good reason. As the demographics of our country continue to evolve, so
too must the demographics
of our choruses. As choral leaders, we should strive for
true inclusivity, reaching out to choristers of diverse backgrounds- ethnic,
socioeconomic and experiential.
We can all agree on the benefits of promoting diversity in
the choral field, whether we direct professional, community or school choirs.
But many choral directors turn around and slam the door on large segments of
the population by creating an audition process that reeks of exclusivity.
As conductors who work with many high school and college
students, we have both been appalled at the number of “selective” choral
programs for students. Discriminating on the basis of “experience” may be the
last acceptable form of prejudice.
Conductors who offer auditioned choral programs where
enrollment is “limited”, “selective” or “competitive” cannot expect to recruit
a truly diverse group of choristers. While the choristers passing such
auditions may be an ethnically diverse group, they will not be representative
of the diverse backgrounds of experience that make up a truly inclusive chorus.
And one of a conductor’s chief joys- one might even say responsibilities- is
the ability to open the door of learning to those who might not otherwise have
access to it. In doing so, we open our ensembles to the passionate engagement
of choristers with diverse experiential backgrounds.
**
KIRSTEN: The most important example for me of diversity
being truly inclusive is through the Summer Choral Intensive program that I
built first in tandem with SACRA/PROFANA in 2014, and then through the South
Shore Children’s Chorus on Boston’s South Shore in 2016. Since the first conception
of the program in late 2013, I knew that inclusivity would be a huge part of
the program model, and no audition or choral experience would be required for
students to participate.
Over the past 3 years (and 4 runs) of the program, I have
come to believe that this is the main reason why the program is so successful.
Mostly, this is due to the “Voice Placement” model that I implemented in year one.
The Voice Placement is a required aspect of the program. When registering for
the program, the students are sent a short excerpt (about 1 min) of a choral
piece, along with a rehearsal track of a professional singer singing their
part. (Note: the track isn’t just of a piano playing notes, but rather of a
singer singing the words. This is an incredibly helpful tool for those students
who have great natural vocal talent, but little training in music literacy.) Students
attend the Voice Placements in groups of their voice part. They come in and
sing together, and then sing the excerpt one by one for the Choral Intensive
Staff (while the other students wait outside).
This model is successful because:
·
It does not rely on a student’s music reading or
piano playing ability to learn how their part goes. But it does put the sole
responsibility on the student to learn their part, since they are given all of
the appropriate tools to learn the excerpt.
·
It does not alienate those students who may not
be able to afford private instruction, or students who may have no choral
experience. Much like listening to the radio, students can memorize the parts
by ear if that is what suits their strengths.
·
It allows students to sing the piece together
with other students with a diversity of experiences before having to sing the piece alone, which reduces nerves for
most students.
Most importantly, the Voice Placement does not determine the student’s acceptance into the summer program. By
the time the Voice Placement comes around, the student is already registered
and accepted into the program. I have had several students attend who are
nervous or underprepared for the Voice Placement experience. However, giving
them an opportunity a month before the program to be nervous or underprepared also
gives them an opportunity to have a
second chance to do better. When we audition, often we give our musicians
(regardless of the level) a one-time-shot – you’re in or you’re out, based on
this moment. Countless times I had students who were completely underprepared
for their Voice Placement, only to later
attend the Choral Intensive week totally prepared, knowing every note and
rhythm in the collegiate-level music they were singing.
This model gives each student a blank slate. Depending on their
experience and understanding of music, they may have to spend a lot of time in
preparation, or just a few hours. However, every
student has the ability to participate.
Several students who have participated in the Summer Choral
Intensive program would have never “made it” into an auditioned program based
on experience, vocal quality, music reading skills, or cost. (Oh, did I mention that this program costs
only $200-$250 per student? Check back soon for a blog post about effective
budgets for your arts organization.) Had these students auditioned for a
program and been rejected in their early stages of singing (14-18 years old),
they may never try to sing again. But the model that we implemented produced
the opposite reaction: several students began to take singing more seriously,
or decided to join, commit, and dedicate themselves to their school choral
programs because they felt like they “could do it.”
The only way we are going to build choral music into the
future is by avoiding the creation of elitist choristers. Teach musicians to
see strengths in everyone around them – not just strengths in vocal quality or
sight-reading skills. Dedication, leadership, commitment, and attitude are all
qualities in choristers that add an incredible amount of worth to a choral team
– both musically and non-musically. Most of the time, these singers who have
strengths outside of the musical realm are the singers that will change the
face of your choral group.
KRISHAN: SACRA/PROFANA, the California-based professional
choir that I direct, has always made diversity a cornerstone of its mission. This
focus on inclusivity encompasses programming and community outreach, but also
the actual makeup of the choir. As Artistic Director, I have always endeavored
to include singers whom other choral conductors may have passed over. In
recruiting these singers, I have often sensed that what the individual might
lack in experience, he or she would more than compensate for in passion,
enthusiasm and commitment. Time after time, this practice of hiring those who
may lack professional choral experience has been powerfully affirmed when the
individual singer has risen to the challenge, bringing a unique perspective and
unmatched loyalty to the ensemble.
In the summer of 2013, just before the start of
SACRA/PROFANA’s 6th Season (which was to be our most intense season
yet), I found myself in need of a new tenor for our 20-voice professional Core
Group, when one of our previous singers unexpectedly dropped out. Our
Operations Manager recommended an acquaintance from her church, a young man who
had limited choral experience, but a wonderful instrument, magnetic stage
presence, impressive raw talent and a great work ethic. While I was slightly
concerned about his lack of choral experience, particularly given the
enormously challenging music that we were tackling that year (including an a cappella performance of Schoenberg’s Friede Auf Erden), I was convinced that
this tenor would be a net positive for the ensemble. His performance over the
next several months surpassed my expectations. In discussing this with him
recently, he recounted:
“Prior to SACRA/PROFANA, my choral experience was limited to my
Indeed, this singer whose lack of choral experience would
have made other professional choral ensembles inaccessible to him, became one
of our most valued and musically reliable singers. Far from being a drawback,
his lack of previous experience ended up being a huge plus for the ensemble, in
that it motivated him to set a strong example of commitment and
professionalism.
**
Our philosophy in this regard can be encapsulated by the
maxim: Meet them where they’re at- then
raise the bar. Get people in the door by creating a welcoming, inclusive
environment. But once they are there, let them know that you have high
standards- and give them the tools to
meet (and exceed) your expectations.
This is not to say that auditions should never be a part of
our process. Some choirs, like SACRA/PROFANA, will always be auditioned.
However, no one should ever be turned away without receiving guidance, and a
chance to improve themselves for the next time around. With SACRA/PROFANA,
those who can’t be accepted into the Core Group are often invited to join the
Auxiliary Chorus, a large volunteer contingent that supplements the
professional Core for larger performances. Even those who aren’t ready for the
volunteer group are given a recommendation to other local choruses, where they
might gain some choral experience. It’s not uncommon for singers to audition
for SACRA/PROFANA repeatedly, often coming back several years in a row as their
skills improve. In some cases, those who come back to audition have eventually
been accepted into the professional Core.
Rather than bemoan the lack of interest in our endeavors, lets get creative in our recruiting efforts and make sure that we're truly creating a place where people of all backgrounds can work together in mutual affirmation.
So nice to hear this - my choral experience is pretty much only adult church choir, maybe 1 singing lesson when I was a kid. I had my first ever audition recently and seemed to do absolutely fine until I fell apart at the sight reading piece. I don't think the conductor knew what to do with me - which is a bit heart breaking because I would work 10 times harder than others just to not let people down. I guess they may still take me on - I am waiting for feedback but it was so disappointing to screw up that part of the audition. :)
ReplyDelete